Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: Bug report: SAML11b / Subject

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: Bug report: SAML11b / Subject


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • Cc: "Cristian Opincaru" <>,
  • Subject: Re: Bug report: SAML11b / Subject
  • Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:16:04 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WBrEymn2jJ/J5y1ZB8ftQpXzrRf1Xrtt7F+kpfqjdlFN+LZtyckvShXpfgNjGG1ne6GZIMhUkN+RG2JTnnv6UtlFc7pmrnqgSFSZ0AOSJVpC3SWo1+ca40XVN+kPq6H3MiWsTva5FHrXt3R6uDJrEiizxl1O6/xyx2iE8RT81zk=
On 10/31/06, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> Assuming I'm looking in the right place, there were a couple of
> revisions five months ago, but these are still bugged. Cristian's
> patch seems to fix this.

Well, then I would have to say you're not.

The date on the last change to that file is May 2006, and the code in svn on
the branch does not match the code that the patch was modifying. It's fixed
in revision 404. At least that exact bug is.

Right, I see that now, thanks.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page