mace-opensaml-users - RE: AttributeValue implementation
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Alexandre Bairos'" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: AttributeValue implementation
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:10:11 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I´ve been using opensaml 2.0 TP1 and noticed that
> AttributeValue implementation classes are not there.
AttributeValue is not a meaningful interface. Its implementation would be
the same as an ElementProxy (and in C++, it's just an empty extension of
that interface).
Not having an actual implementation for it means that to build one you have
to build an ElementProxy and override the element name and/or type. That's
the only reason I did an implementation in C++, to simplify the builder.
-- Scott
- AttributeValue implementation, Alexandre Bairos, 08/16/2006
- RE: AttributeValue implementation, Scott Cantor, 08/16/2006
- Re: AttributeValue implementation, Chad La Joie, 08/16/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.