mace-opensaml-users - RE: Excluding log4cpp
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Girish Sundarraj" <>
- To: "Scott Cantor" <>
- Cc: <>
- Subject: RE: Excluding log4cpp
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 21:01:17 +0530
Hi Scott,
Thanks. I shall take it up from here.
Regards,
Girish
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 8:40 PM
To: Girish Sundarraj
Cc:
Subject: RE: Excluding log4cpp
> One quick question! Can we by any way exclude log4cpp from our
> openSAML
> C++ build.
Sure, by editing the code and removing all the logging calls.
> Is there any provision to do so? If so what would be the impact? If
> not possible can we alter openSAML code such that we remove the
> reference to log4cpp and build the library? What would u suggest. This
> is the question raised by our legal department to check for the
> possibility & feasibility.
I don't understand the reasoning behind worrying about an LGPL library
unless you plan to make changes to it, and even if you did, it's not
nice to go fixing open source libraries and then not return the fixes to
everybody else.
-- Scott
- Excluding log4cpp, Girish Sundarraj, 05/04/2006
- RE: Excluding log4cpp, Scott Cantor, 05/04/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Excluding log4cpp, Girish Sundarraj, 05/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.