mace-opensaml-users - RE: v. 1.1

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: v. 1.1

From: Jason Pedone <>
To: Scott Cantor <>, 'Tom Scavo' <>
Cc:
Subject: RE: v. 1.1
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=s5IrqDdxQrNT4zcrmZTQi06+4QSDf6QJ4Drz7UYdODxXnXvGb+6lAJf/ERzU5a/vKoPXCZrkvdcYBGuv6QK1Mk49DrsL64MaoJ5DbcOybf4Bu1WXKbXTd63OTV3HPTgwHBc/SUuSxbObyIgok/VucgLQVf5gEDcrj/OJ8+Dc21Q= ;

I was assuming the b meant beta, thanks for
clarifying,

JP

--- Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:

> > OpenSAML 1.1 *is* a production (in fact, terminal)
> release. Are you
> > referring to OpenSAML 2.0?
>
> I think he's (wrongly) assuming 1.1b means beta. For
> autoconf reasons, I
> prefer not to issue small patches with different
> version numbers.
>
> I guess I'll skip (b) in the future.
>
> -- Scott
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

v. 1.1, Jason Pedone, 04/06/2006
- Re: v. 1.1, Tom Scavo, 04/06/2006
  - RE: v. 1.1, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2006
    - RE: v. 1.1, Jason Pedone, 04/06/2006

List archive

RE: v. 1.1