mace-opensaml-users - Re: v. 1.1
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To: "Jason Pedone" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: v. 1.1
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:04:12 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W5xV8EEc9PRIvJkcPJ4h4xi6xok4IM1hlkkUNtQXOjSmMeKujgW0EzvZ4PqciILMqsOhaHN75zoxo0IQoiz/eb7208KBYRW28Z2gwPH8nbl8HMefZKrNXHUIl1mjMjULQSEqQE5uGOtZPNkxWC5WMuV11JHz8aZXXJKjQtQ+a94=
On 4/6/06, Jason Pedone
<>
wrote:
> Any idea on when v. 1.1 will come out of beta? I
> would like to use it for a project I'm working on but
> the client has a strict policy about utilizing only
> production releases.
OpenSAML 1.1 *is* a production (in fact, terminal) release. Are you
referring to OpenSAML 2.0?
Tom
- v. 1.1, Jason Pedone, 04/06/2006
- Re: v. 1.1, Tom Scavo, 04/06/2006
- RE: v. 1.1, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2006
- RE: v. 1.1, Jason Pedone, 04/06/2006
- RE: v. 1.1, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2006
- Re: v. 1.1, Tom Scavo, 04/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.