Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML 2.0 AuthnRequest

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: SAML 2.0 AuthnRequest


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • To: "'Andreas Åkre Solberg'" <>, "'OpenSAML'" <>
  • Subject: RE: SAML 2.0 AuthnRequest
  • Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:06:26 -0500
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

In future, please use the saml-dev or security-services-comment lists at
OASIS, this isn't a general SAML question list.

> In SAML 2.0, the AuthnRequest can be sent from the service provider
> with the user to the IdP before the user is authenticated (Service
> first Web browser SSO Profile).

It normally is sent before.

> I wonder what the subject element
> should contain in this scenario.

Normally it's not present. If it is, it's usually as part of a
reauthentication and is just there as a sanity check.

> Should it contain an empty
> subjectconfirmation and no nameidentifier ? What should the
> subjectconfirmation@method
> be?

The SSO profile specifically precludes passing a confirmation in the
request. Other profiles may not (and in fact do not, there's a Liberty
profile that uses it).

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page