Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML versions

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: OpenSAML versions


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: "Diego R. Lopez" <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: OpenSAML versions
  • Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:24:23 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k7gIxqhtfo2gdOSoXD4XITT7APXWyXFCwiTZ/3X+X6FkQUEA7eAxxsWo/Fc7wGvAfE9zOnOrbnf8Iy1wiKLEP8XIoRcBuC/bHAljm8JW33fOL2RMmEvjGx6YG12IdfxPbXHdFIZWc9jwlK44CgPG9G/t9LDTtS30Nx1l+gcc/mY=

On 12/19/05, Diego R. Lopez
<>
wrote:
>
> You've done a great job with the SAML introductory material.
> Something really useful to recommend to those involved in the eduGAIN
> stuff right now. I'd really appreciate if you warn me when you
> consider the 2.0 one completed.

Sure, but this isn't a high priority at the moment since our project
(GridShib) relies on SAML 1.1.

> I just wanted to mention that there is an existing open-source
> implementation of SAML 2.0. It is called LASSO and you can have
> a look on it at http://lasso.entrouvert.org/

Thanks for the pointer. I've looked at LASSO before. As far as I can
tell, it is an implementation of Liberty ID-FF, which is not SAML. Am
I missing something?

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page