mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML versions

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: OpenSAML versions

From: Tom Scavo <>
To: Walter Hoehn <>
Cc: OpenSAML <>
Subject: Re: OpenSAML versions
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:27:12 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YpmJcFi6l/mszoMI8cGJQB5vj8Ujhnm53cBWLNHl0sPwqokkAmKNuvk2lw3kGoXruDHx8nYZFd1jwUgwpBj8tL67Nv89JH9cmZpX0VrWfrxrzHE7fbJ2YouxPLJ+7TmoMoaLGomAWfOupwJvcLyAkHa0gW0Uq/1UkmQa0p7QZKQ=

Thanks, Walter. I added this to the Intro to SAML presentation I'm writing:

http://grid.ncsa.uiuc.edu/presentations/saml-intro-dec05.ppt

Also, here are two SAML presentations with more detail:

http://grid.ncsa.uiuc.edu/presentations/saml-v1_x-tech-overview-dec05.ppt
http://grid.ncsa.uiuc.edu/presentations/saml-v2_0-intro-dec05.ppt

The latter is far from finished, but it's a start, I guess.

Cheers,
Tom

On 12/7/05, Walter Hoehn
<>
wrote:
> These should be roughly correct...
>
> -Walter
>
> On Dec 1, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Tom Scavo wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to summarize the history of OpenSAML for a presentation I'm
> > giving next week:
> >
> > OpenSAML 1.1 Aug 2005
>
> July 2005
>
> > OpenSAML 1.0 ?
>
> June 2004
>
> > OpenSAML 0.9 ?
>
> June 2003
>
> > OpenSAML 0.8 ?
>
> March 2003
>
> > OpenSAML 0.7 ?
>
> Nov 2002
>
> >
> > Could someone help me fill in the blanks? I've checked CVS and the
> > archives, but haven't been able to pin down the dates.
>
>

OpenSAML versions, Tom Scavo, 12/01/2005
- Re: OpenSAML versions, Walter Hoehn, 12/07/2005
  - Re: OpenSAML versions, Tom Scavo, 12/16/2005
    - Re: OpenSAML versions, Diego R. Lopez, 12/19/2005
      - Re: OpenSAML versions, Tom Scavo, 12/19/2005
        
        RE: OpenSAML versions, Scott Cantor, 12/19/2005
        
        Re: OpenSAML versions, Diego R. Lopez, 12/19/2005

List archive

Re: OpenSAML versions