Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML version nightmare

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: OpenSAML version nightmare


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: OpenSAML version nightmare
  • Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:38:06 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gfhf90JQmKrNnyNH44mRBY19gSRb0g7ZYDwgkeo3xU9+BpVZtzP1u35seZjLyJzXp1oG9S/6prc5MkJEWv4S77LGdDjcMKtlSpGltQyuLbmInp/TAx2C/Nj+Be5aDng1qIfHGVGfGgXOIjBiX+ivOBS7yXQ9GP50Hrr/zNyIQ40=
On 11/15/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> For metadata consumption purposes, borrowing the Shibboleth code is a much
> better way to go.

We know about the Java metadata code but is there C++ metadata code?
(I suppose there would have to be if the C++ SP consumes metadata, but
I'm much less familiar with the C++ side of the house so I thought I'd
ask.)

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page