mace-opensaml-users - SAML 1.1 browser/artifact profile
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Mintoo C <>
- To:
- Subject: SAML 1.1 browser/artifact profile
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:03:32 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OrwFbn/usFdRURmxl8i/wU07JsLlAxi9hBfn2ZW4XyVTGt6wEEfGzGhIzrhGqQWDF2b1I/C08u1/pFxUBXHayXi88LnVE5Ok4LadvgdbIhqHtfwy3qWYo6bwcAUJMMeQd6mIG84BTfzpEiU9raNPEJye8VmW1PkqV4Sj/iJNAiU=
Hi!
I'm new to SAML.
I'll be part implementing SAML1.1
We will primarily be using the Browser/Artifact Profile (not sure if
support for destination-Sit-first or Source-Site-First or both is
required currently).
There are a couple of questions I have on how well openSAML could comlement
us.
1/ Would openSAML work with any SOAP implementation (eg. - GLUE)
2/ Does openSAML cover the entire assertion and protocol schema?
If we take a deviation by using java-xml binding, how far could
openSAML be re-used.
Are there any preferences/issues for openSAML not using java binding
3/ The test suite doesn't seem to have a test class for the
Browser/Artifact profile. Maybe i'm missing something here.
4/ Do you have a starters kit. That would be helpful.
Would really appreciate your reply.
Thanks in advance.
-Mintoo
- SAML 1.1 browser/artifact profile, Mintoo C, 03/04/2005
- Re: SAML 1.1 browser/artifact profile, Tom Scavo, 03/04/2005
- RE: SAML 1.1 browser/artifact profile, Scott Cantor, 03/04/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.