mace-opensaml-users - SAML 2.0 Implementation

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

SAML 2.0 Implementation

From: Prasad Shenoy <>
To: Scott Cantor <>
Cc:
Subject: SAML 2.0 Implementation
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:11:39 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=dGxs6V9G9AgiQnqRg1mBL5gGDQe9Wmpmy1wgqBJ3LZ3GVu94QVUeM1KwD/8cnON1ZUDkgiQaP3jYiJsj2V9bBawaMTLX2uP4a5v4KKS6n7GfZivW4a1R7B8pPdDtfVN42MOT1XLuEtYVGkTzVLjs1UnYtLSsH8KI18Ra+uLh1uc=

Hi Scott,

I was following your dicussion with respect to Prakash's concern. I
was wondering about your plans for SAML 2.0 Implementation. I am
looking at SAML 2.0 specs at the moment. Is there any implementation
work already in the pipeline ? Other than SourceID who I guess are
working on SAML 2.0 Toolkit, is there any open source version being
built ?

Your thougths on extending the already existing openSAML 1.1 toolkit ?
I know that SAML 2.0 has a different face than SAML 1.1 but I guess
lot of work from SAML 1.1 can be used for building / extending to SAML
2.0 nonetheless.

If you remember, I had asked you this question a while back but I
thought I might check back with you to get the current status :)

Thanks.
--
Prasad
www.fisc.com

Loading mod_shib on Apache1.3.33, Shivam Sinha, 01/28/2005
- RE: Loading mod_shib on Apache1.3.33, Scott Cantor, 01/28/2005
  - SAML 2.0 Implementation, Prasad Shenoy, 01/29/2005
    - RE: SAML 2.0 Implementation, Scott Cantor, 01/29/2005

List archive

SAML 2.0 Implementation