mace-opensaml-users - RE: C++ SAMLResponse
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: ,
- Subject: RE: C++ SAMLResponse
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 13:49:13 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> There is a bug in the SAMLResponse CTOR (at about line 75)
> whereby the presence of an "inResponseTo" parameter results
> in the "m_responseId" and not the "m_inResponseTo" being assigned to.
Yep, just fixed it, thanks.
I expect to branch for 1.0 by next week at the latest.
-- Scott
- C++ SAMLResponse, andy, 05/06/2004
- RE: C++ SAMLResponse, Scott Cantor, 05/06/2004
- What is digested, Mark Wilcox, 05/07/2004
- RE: What is digested, Scott Cantor, 05/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.