OpenSAML user discussion

[Scott Cantor <>]

> Just a question about the C++ implementation of OpenSAML. 
> This may have changed since I last looked so shut me down if 
> necessary! Does anyone know if there are any plans to 
> implement the SAMLSOAPBinding::recieve (actually should be 
> "receive" :-) ) function? 

Ouch, thanks for the catch. ;-)

And, not really. At least not on my part for the time being.

> I realize this is probably not a 
> trivial thing, as it no doubt requires some fairly involved 
> HTTP(S) server code, unless assumptions are made about the 
> context that it is being called in. ie. gets passed in input 
> stream from some calling server code......

Right, that's pretty much the problem. It's just not been an issue yet (in
fact I was under the impression that apart from Shibboleth and me
personally, there's nothing else using or particularly interested in the C++
version).

I would guess it could be implemented inside Apache using APR, perhaps, or
possibly even just libapreq for that matter, but I haven't looked into it.

The ability to override the class certainly argues for the ability for
people to implement it as they might see fit.

-- Scott

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

    http://archives.internet2.edu/

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users--