Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

layer3communitygroup - Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria

Subject: NAOPpag Subcommittee

List archive

Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chris Robb <>
  • To: "Spears, Christopher M." <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria
  • Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:14:39 -0400

If its a major set of changes, comments and suggested language might be the best overall structure. That way you don’t have to worry about the wordsmithing. 


-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2, Director of Architecture and Services
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188

On Mar 13, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Spears, Christopher M. <> wrote:

Chris,

How much detail should be in this document (without be prescriptive as to how one implement things), and how much latitude are you permitting for changes?

I saw a number of good comments & questions in the Google doc, and wasn’t sure how to incorporate them without non-trivial changes to the draft.   Even the seeded 'overall evaluation questions' begged more detail to be introduced into the draft, unless they weren’t meant to be answered there.

-Chris



On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

All:

Linda and I didn’t receive any edits or suggestions to the draft consolidation report. I did see a few edits to the Google doc that had the list of evaluation criteria, so it may be that folks overlooked the Word document attached to the original note. We want to make sure folks have a chance to weigh in, so I’m re-attaching the document we’re seeking input on. Each team should be looking at it from the evaluation perspectives laid out in the Google doc. If everyone can try and do that by Friday, we’ll be in a better place. 

-Chris


-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2, Director of Architecture and Services
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188

On Mar 10, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

Good morning everyone! I just wanted to gently remind folks that we’d like to get comments back on the draft document by end of day tomorrow. Recall that you can send comments to myself or Linda in e-mail or you can mark up the document itself and send back. Thanks!


-Chris

-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2, Director of Architecture and Services
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188

On Feb 27, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

All:

Thanks again for another productive call this afternoon. I’ve attached an updated version of the report that addressed some of the feedback on the call today. Since I was talking at the time, my notes are a bit spotty on everything we discussed, so please let me know if I missed anything in particular. 

I’ve created a google document with the evaluation questions that John Moore wrote up a few weeks ago and the evaluation teams we agreed to on the call. The list of questions was meant to be a list of items to keep in mind. They are by no means complete, so feel free to add to them. 


For the evaluation teams, I’ve provided my rollup of the goals in those areas, as they came out of the peering futures report from early 2014. 

Many thanks again to everyone who will spend time reviewing. Please try and have comments back to my by March 11. You can comment in the document itself or just send an e-mail with feedback. Please send to both Linda Roos and myself and we’ll aggregate. 

Have a great weekend!

-Chris


<Layer3 Consolidation Report v2 20150227.docx>

-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2, Director of Architecture and Services
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188



<Layer3 Consolidation Report v2 20150227.docx>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page