layer3communitygroup - Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria
Subject: NAOPpag Subcommittee
List archive
- From: "Spears, Christopher M." <>
- To: Chris Robb <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:50:09 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=temperror (sender IP is 164.107.81.214) ; internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
Chris,
How much detail should be in this document (without be prescriptive as to how one implement things), and how much latitude are you permitting for changes?
I saw a number of good comments & questions in the Google doc, and wasn’t sure how to incorporate them without non-trivial changes to the draft. Even the seeded 'overall evaluation questions' begged more detail to be introduced into the draft, unless
they weren’t meant to be answered there.
-Chris
On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Chris Robb <> wrote:
|
- Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria, Chris Robb, 03/10/2015
- Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria, Chris Robb, 03/12/2015
- Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria, Spears, Christopher M., 03/13/2015
- Message not available
- Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria, Chris Robb, 03/13/2015
- Re: Updated Layer3 Community Group Report and Evaluation Criteria, Chris Robb, 03/12/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.