grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder
Chronological Thread
- From: Siju Jacob <>
- To: "Hyzer, Chris" <>, Jeffrey Williams <>
- Cc: " Mailing List" <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:39:54 +0000
Thanks Chris…
From: Hyzer, Chris <>
I think that suggestion is a good one. Still lots of ways to do this.
Group now has “types” that can mark folders or groups so they can be designated by something other than the folder they are in.
https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+types+on+objects
But the folder structure is still important…
At penn we don’t separate courses into separate school folders since there are so many crosslistings anyways. We do payroll orgs centrally too
At penn we delegate the org folder SchoolOfEngineering, they use that for whatever they want. For the generic reference groups those might be better placed centrally. IF the school has reference groups that are loaded, there could be loader jobs there as well if specific to that school.
ref:student:courses:<term>:<course>:<section>:… all courses centrally managed ref:employee:payrollOrgs:<orgCode> all payroll orgs centrally managed basis:idm:affiliations:<affilCode> all raw affiliations ref:idm:roles:employee|student|etc rollup of raw basis affiliations ref:org:SchoolOfEngineering: whatever that school wants to do with this folder ref:org:SchoolOfEngineering:app their apps
Thanks Chris
From: <>
On Behalf Of Jeffrey Williams
Hi Siju,
I inherited our Grouper system a few years ago and have been slowly making adjustments to get it more in line with what the deployment guide suggests.
(my $0.02) Bottom of Page 28 ought to get you where you need to be:
One way to slice it would be to organize your schools under org: (e.g. Rutgers:SchoolOfEngineering, Rutgers:SchoolOfArtsAndSciences, etc) and replicate at least some part of the top-level structure under that. I'd say etc: and ref: at minimum. The schools' ref:(p26) would house student, course, and dept. groups scoped to that particular school. e.g.
Rutgers:SchoolOfEngineering:ref:course: - course rosters including instructors, TAs, etc Rutgers:SchoolOfEngineering:ref:dept: - organization hierarchies Rutgers:SchoolOfEngineering:ref:student: - types of students (class year, on-track-grad, incoming-class...)
That's my read on it. Any others?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 3:25 PM Siju Jacob <> wrote:
-- |
- [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Siju Jacob, 03/15/2019
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Julio Polo, 03/15/2019
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Jeffrey Williams, 03/15/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Hyzer, Chris, 03/16/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Siju Jacob, 03/18/2019
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Ben Beecher, 03/18/2019
- RE: [grouper-users] grouper 2.3 folder hierarchy for schools and courses folder, Hyzer, Chris, 03/16/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.