Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
- From: Akki Kumar <>
- To: "Bee-Lindgren, Bert" <>
- Cc: Dave Churchley <>, Jeffrey Crawford <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Re: Grouper PSPNG
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:27:34 -0500
At your earliest convenience, please let me know estimated time for the bug fix.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Akki Kumar <> wrote:
Hi Bert,Checking status of the below ticket.Since above ticket is holding our Grouper update from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0, please let me know estimated time (for the bug fix) so that I can forward a message to our management and plan accordingly.Thank you,AkkiOn Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Akki Kumar <
>wrote:Yes, adding configuration flag seems to be a right way do it since it will give the flexibility to create groups with or without members based on the flag configuration.Thank you,AkkiOn Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Bee-Lindgren, Bert <> wrote:I understand. This thread is about groups that require a member (groupOfNames) and, in particular, what to do with them when the group no longer has members.
My thought is to add a configuration flag memberIsRequired that would both combine group creation with the addition of the initial member as well as delete the group when the last member is removed.
Does this sound right?
Thanks very much,Bert
On Oct 3, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Dave Churchley <> wrote:
Yes, this would definitely be the case for us.
- Re: [grouper-users] Re: Grouper PSPNG, Akki Kumar, 02/09/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] Re: Grouper PSPNG, Akki Kumar, 02/21/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.