Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

[Celine Dusset <>]

Hi,

Maybe i was not very clear... For example, i have groups under multiple stems like this :

• ref:stem1:stem2:pers 
• org:stem1:stem2:members
  

I'm searching for a way to publish them with name modified like:

• stem2:pers
• stem2:members

I 'm not entirely sure how to achieve this, i think about a few changes in psp-resolver.xml like setting to xsi:type="ad:Script" an attribute (to modify manually a group's name returned) but which one ?

Thank you

**************

Céline Dusset

Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis

DSI  - Service Transverse

Pôle Référentiels, outils de pilotage et de fiabilisation

Tel. 1.6731/04.92.07.67.31

---

De : Jeffrey Crawford <>
Envoyé : jeudi 26 mai 2016 19:47
À : Celine Dusset
Cc :
Objet : Re: [grouper-users] PSP : Provisioning flat without base folder name in the group's name

 

This is done in the resolver, there should be an entry like the following in the "psp-resolver.xml" file:

  <resolver:AttributeDefinition
    id="stemDn"
    xsi:type="psp-grouper-ldap:LdapDnFromGrouperNamePSOIdentifier"
    structure="${edu.internet2.middleware.psp.structure}"
    sourceAttributeID="stemNameInStem"
    rdnAttributeName="ou"
    baseDn="${edu.internet2.middleware.psp.groupsBaseDn}"
    baseStem="${edu.internet2.middleware.psp.baseStem}">
    <!-- Dependencies which return a "stemNameInStem" attribute whose value is the stem name. -->
    <resolver:Dependency ref="stemNameInStem" />
  </resolver:AttributeDefinition>

You'll need to override the "structure" entry to instead of reading from a variable, to setting it to "flat". You'll additionally need to do this for all resolvers with "id" containing "stem" but not the ones containing "group".

Jeffrey

Both pilots and IT professionals require training and currency before charging into clouds!

---------------------------------------

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Celine Dusset <> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I was searching for a way to ommit some base stem names in group's name to be provisionned (by PSP 2.2.2) in a flat conf (I understand the uniqness risk)

I've found in archives an old message on this subject (2013):

please Mr Gagné or someone else could you help me for the hook and the "psp magic" or maybe there is now another way to do that ?

Thank you very very much in advance for your help ;-)

**************

Céline Dusset

Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis

DSI  - Service Transverse

Pôle Référentiels, outils de pilotage et de fiabilisation

Tel. 1.6731/04.92.07.67.31