Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

["Hyzer, Chris" <>]

I would look in membershipType for immediate or other.  Note you can get two 
memberships for the same subject in the same group (e.g. one immediate, one 
effective... or maybe multiple with effective.  That could also be 
"composite" I believe as well... which is another reason to look at immediate 
or not...

Thanks
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Carmody 
[mailto:]
 
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:44 PM
To: Hyzer, Chris 
<>;
 Grouper-Users 
<>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] web services, info about group members

Thanks very much !

Using get memberships, it looks like I get back:

1) an array of [wsMemberships] objects. On each object the 
membershipType value is either effective or immediate (that was my 
previous question). There's also a subjectId value.

2) an array of [wsSubjects] objects. On each object there are useful 
values (eg name), and there's also an id value (which matches the 
subjectId value in the other array).

Did I understand that correctly ?

thanks !

On 2/10/16 4:02 PM, Hyzer, Chris wrote:
> If you want the list of members, call getMembers().
>
> There are two ways to differentiate immediate or not...
>
> 1. call get members twice. Once for all, once with memberFilter of
Immediate, and those are the subset that is immediate
>
> - or -
>
> 2. call get memberships and each entry will have metadata (e.g. if
immediate) on it...
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  
> [mailto:]
>  On Behalf Of Steven Carmody
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:53 PM
> To: Grouper-Users 
> <>
> Subject: [grouper-users] web services, info about group members
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the getMembers Web Service; it returns the set of groups and
> People who are members of the group that I'm querying.
>
> I'm looking for a way to differentiate the People who are direct members
> from the People who are indirect members. I'm not currently seeing any
> info in the response from Grouper that would help with this process....
>
> Suggestions as to how to differentiate these two sets of people ?
>
> thanks.
>