Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] Selective Provisioning

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] Selective Provisioning


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Shilen Patel <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Selective Provisioning
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:57:25 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: umassd.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
  • Sn1pr0501mb1839: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted

A patch is available for this now - grouper_v2_2_1_api_patch_15


Thanks!

- Shilen

From: Shilen Patel <>
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 1:04 PM
To: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Selective Provisioning

Hi Matt,

We talked about this on the grouper call this afternoon and decided to take NYU’s contribution ( https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Selective+Group+Exclusion+When+Provisioning+to+LDAP ) and include it as a patch in Grouper.  We’ll respond back when that’s done.

Thanks!

- Shilen

On 6/11/15, 11:09 AM, "" <> wrote:

Hello!

We're working on a grouper proof-of-concept here at UMass Dartmouth.  One of
the issues we're currently stuck on is with composite groups and NOT
provisioning the sub groups associated with them to our LDAP (389).  For
instance, we would rather NOT have the "systemOfRecord" "includes", "excludes"
and "includes and systemOfRecords" groups pushed into the 389.  Is there a way
we can accomplish this?   I'd rather not cruft up the 389 with groups that
we'll likely never use at all.

Thank you,

Matt Robinson
IT Development Manager
Computing & Information Technology Services
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

Claire T. Carney Library, Suite 415
285 Old Westport Road
North Dartmouth, MA  02747
tel: 508.999.8119



  • Re: [grouper-users] Selective Provisioning, Shilen Patel, 07/14/2015

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page