Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
RE: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?
- From: Chris Hyzer <>
- To: Steven Carmody <>, Grouper-Users <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:22:46 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Typically we just give them access to a folder, and they decide on the
substructure :) Automagically doing it for them sounds like an interesting
idea so there is some consistency though...
Might want to have a security folder where the groups are that have
read/update/admin/view on the groups in the department. This way you don't
have to maintain the same security lists in multiple locations. Know what I
mean? E.g. folder:whatever:depts:dept1:security:dept1readers would be people
who have read in that department
folder:whatever:depts:dept1:security:dept1admins would be people who have
admin on groups, create/stem on folders
Note, with 2.0 you can put a rule on the department folder that will
automatically assign these permissions to groups in the folder structure if
you like :)
On Behalf Of Steven Carmody
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:54 AM
Subject: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?
I'm seeking thoughts and experience. Let me provide some background
information, and our current thoughts. However, I'm really looking to
start a conversation, and hear what other people are thinking.
We've begun to walk down the road to providing departments with
department-related groups. We're expecting to provide 1) some
auto-magically provisioned groups using information from various
Business systems, and 2) delegate to the department the authority to
create and manage groups for their specific needs. Beyond that, of
course, we have the usual range of departments, from very small to very
large, including both administrative and academic. So there's a wide
span of requirements and complexity.
Having spent too many years with naming hierarchies of various sorts, my
initial inclination is to provide a small standard set of top level
containers within each department container. Having a single flat name
space at the top level frankly gives me a bad sort of itch; I think our
experience with file systems, etc gives us enough hints about the types
of groups people will want that we can make some educated guesses about
"categories". OTOH, we don't want to over-prescribe a single framework
on everyone, and we don't want to force a deep multi-level hierarchy on
We're currently thinking of this set of top level containers:
-- People (this would contain auto-provisioned groups like Faculty,
Staff, Grad Students, Concentrators, student workers, etc). The dept
could manage groups containing "affiliated faculty" (eg people in other
depts who aren't official members of this dept but are considered to be
unofficial members of this dept; some affiliates could be from other
This container would likely also contain groups related to the
administrative structure of the dept. In all likelihood, these would
have to be manually maintained by the dept.
-- Projects This would contain groups related to various Projects that
the dept is involved with; many of these could contain people from other
depts; research groups could contain people from other campuses. The
dept would be authorized to manage everything in this container. We're
assuming that a Research group would create their own container and
namespace within this container.
-- Applications (or Services). This would contain groups that have
various privileges within centrally-offered services (eg who can
edit/approve changes to the dept web site on the central web server). We
expect that each application will include a "grouper-lite-lite" GUI
allowing an admin to browse and manage memberships relevant to this
application. These groups are placed in a well-defined location so that
the relevant application can find them.
-- Other (love that name...) The dept can do whatever they want within
-- a dept can also ask us to create additional top level containers for
-- Note that Course-related groups are placed elsewhere in the hierarchy.
So... what are other sites doing with departmentally-related groups ?
- [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?, Steven Carmody, 08/23/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 08/23/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?, Chris Hyzer, 08/24/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] schema(s) for departmental groups ?, Tom Barton, 08/28/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.