Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] question about Grouper permissions....

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] question about Grouper permissions....


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Zeller <>
  • To: Grouper-Users <>
  • Cc: Steven Carmody <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] question about Grouper permissions....
  • Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:09:21 -0700 (MST)

Oops, a pluton is the intersection of a plugin and a proton based
spell-checker :-) And that's ldappcng, i.e. 1.5+

On Aug 22, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Tom Zeller
<>
wrote:

> The ldappc pluton architecture is modeled after shib idpv2. There is an
> existing jira to provide an application specific provisioning target
> project suitable for eclipse, ala the shib extension.
>
> (a quick reply whilst I am out of office)
>
> On Aug 22, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Steven Carmody
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for what is likely to be an inane question ;-)
>>
>> I'm looking for a high level description of Grouper's support for
>> permissions...
>>
>> I've watched the video "Grouper permission assignment screen first pass ",
>> and that's consistent with what I'd expect to see....
>>
>> Here's my attempt at describing the model:
>>
>> A "permission definition" is created, and then someone assigns that
>> permission to a Role (and perhaps to just some entities while operating in
>> that role).
>>
>> "permission definition"s, tho, look like strings ?
>>
>> So, how are these "pushed" into the target application ? Does ldappcng do
>> that ? Is it expected that they will be pushed into ldap, and the target
>> application looks at attribute values to see if someone has a specific
>> permission?
>>
>> We have applications that export APIs that allow a provisioning program to
>> specify which group/role can do VERB on RESOURCE X -- is there some sort
>> of plugin architecture in ldappcng -- where we provide the appropriate
>> plugin and something like ldappcng will use our plugin ?
>>
>> Once again, sorry for the Q -- I assume this has been discussed somewhere,
>> and I just can't find it.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page