grouper-users - ldappc list-empty-value usage and potential deprecation ?
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To: Grouper Users Mailing List <>
- Subject: ldappc list-empty-value usage and potential deprecation ?
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:33:36 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=UntcxDNuklUjmG95oiOZEhr8H9HT4+bGh75MIYCRAfjpsDxM/fC2AJ+VzP7sSll2PG p+BDNAQew+QcmMGcaDFYhBk06JraE0L+WdvxZPc+mKZbynQNWWtWMvgTTE5TDJZrUstU W0N3p21AxwOhNL8A4KhrfHpNri46ciM8ZbFus=
Is anyone using list-empty-value when provisioning memberships or groups ?
Are there objections to removing the functionality that list-empty-value provides ?
I don't see how ldappc can correctly populate the list-empty-value, because ldappc does not slurp all values of a membership or member attribute, hence it doesn't know when the attribute is empty.
I understand the notion that a membership or member attribute might be mandatory, but is that a real-world scenario that we want to continue to support ?
From the docs, list-empty-value is described as follows:
"Defines the value to be placed in the attribute if no values are stored there. If the attribute is optional (i.e., a MAY attribute), this value is most likely not needed. If the attribute is required (i.e., a MUST attribute), then this value should be defined."
Thanks,
TomZ
- ldappc list-empty-value usage and potential deprecation ?, Tom Zeller, 03/19/2009
- Re: [grouper-users] ldappc list-empty-value usage and potential deprecation ?, Peter Schober, 03/19/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.