Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

[Steve Edgar <>]

Here at Cornell, we would like to deploy Grouper as a replacement for  
our current central AuthZ system.  Group/member info would be  
provisioned out to a LDAP directory server.

Some requirements we have for the directory server are ...

1) Must support private groups
2) Must support very large groups (190K members)
3) All queries must be fast, regardless of group size
4) All clients must be able to use a simple and consistent query

As posted previously, we've found using static groups allows us  
achieve all but number 3 above.  To get around that problem, we've  
looked into using "singleton pairs", which works like this ...

Say we have a group named ...

man.fred

... and it contains these members ...




... and it is a private group which can only be read by a client  
authenticated as the Kerberos principal ...



For the group man.fred, 2 entries (singleton pairs) would get created  
in directory server ...



groupname=man.fred




groupname=man.fred


Each cn entry is created by combining the group name and a member.

Quick disclaimer... I made up the groupname attribute.  Whatever  
attribute name is appropriate would go there.

To support private groups, we have an ACI which checks the Kerberos  
principal of the authenticated client against  
cornelledugroupreadpriv.  An anonymous bind can not read a private  
group.

A client can make the 3 simple queries we need ...

1) Check for membership.  To find out of  is a member  
of man.fred, search for ...



Or, search for ...


 and groupname=man.fred.

(I am not a directory person, but I am assuming the second search is  
slower.)

2) List groups for a member.  To list all groups for  
, search for all entries which contain ...



... and return each groupname that matches.

3) List members in a group.  To list all members in a group, search  
for ...

groupname=man.fred

... and return each hasmember that matches.

One drawback is this approach uses a lot of entries.  However, our  
testing shows all 3 queries are fast, regardless of group size.

We realize another drawback is we would have to do our own  
provisioning from Grouper to directory server.

We are interested in what other folks think of using this "singleton  
pairs" approach.

-- Steve.