Grouper Developers Forum

[Chris Hyzer <>]

I vote yes, my understanding is c3p0 is better than dbcp, but if anyone wants 
to keep it speak up now

Thanks,
chris

-----Original Message-----
From: 

 
[mailto:]
 On Behalf Of Tom Zeller
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:10 PM
To: Chris Hyzer
Cc: Grouper Dev
Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] remind me : java 1.6 or 1.5 ?

Should we drop 
edu.internet2.middleware.subject.provider.DbcpJdbcConnectionProvider
?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Chris Hyzer 
<>
 wrote:
> We require 1.6, and we use c3p0, not dbcp...
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  
> [mailto:]
>  On Behalf Of Tom Zeller
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:17 AM
> To: Grouper Dev
> Subject: [grouper-dev] remind me : java 1.6 or 1.5 ?
>
> Do we require java 1.6 now ? I don't remember.
>
> I was looking at upgrading the version of commons-dbcp for an ehcache
> dependency, and 1.4 of dbcp supports JDK 6 while 1.3 supports JDK 5.
>