grouper-dev - [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

[grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap

From: Tom Zeller <>
To: Grouper Dev <>
Subject: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:40:37 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=iFRBySjxuWhiUzZcWoO6H0s0uKztXwZ5Re9JPctgGyr7gynylJFw+V4PRcJwF9Ezi5 i/p6achBdsIh4Xr4Gt1qUsK8Lf7u23Y54+QQkMyv8E+nFll5Ap/avvHRIw91ioW1VNGd mtYqosuro3j7yZSnDOo4Be1R4u6TWd3+2j89k=

After changing my mind several times, the I2 SAs installed OpenLDAP in
a few minutes :-)

I think we should decide how we want to provision the DIT.

People objects could be in ou=people, with passwords for ldaps or
https authentication.

ou=people,dc=grouper,dc=edu
cn=mchyzer
cn=tbarton
...

Groups could be in versioned dc's :

ou=groups,dc=1.6.3,dc=grouper,dc=edu
ou=groups,dc=1.7.0,dc=grouper,dc=edu
...

It might be wise to run more than one instance of OpenLDAP on
different ports, for example with referential integrity and memberOf
overlays, or not.

Thoughts ? (besides what took so long)

[grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Tom Zeller, 03/30/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Chris Hyzer, 03/30/2011
  - Re: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Tom Zeller, 03/30/2011
    - RE: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Chris Hyzer, 03/30/2011
      - Re: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Tom Zeller, 03/30/2011
        
        RE: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Chris Hyzer, 03/30/2011
        
        Re: [grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap, Tom Zeller (tzeller), 03/31/2011

List archive

[grouper-dev] grouperdemo ldap