grouper-dev - [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] rules on groups in stem
Subject: Grouper Developers Forum
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To: Chris Hyzer <>
- Cc: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] rules on groups in stem
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:33:07 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=B7RXDuocbUXHYOb9D2RaEFPlxjagi54JoDmumers5UDZH7UAOg0W0njBsSbgezHw8X NkkC2Ejxn0eLR1ArQf6ZB/ceVipZ74kMiwdl+TunV4rWKO6ZlvrIJzh8BzAHbriOUfk0 5la0jLoF+GxMQsmrBNFrxdCEjvZwVgQ5cXzZ0=
> I guess what I am saying, is that unless someone wants to use the folder
> way, I would like to just nix this implementation of depending on folders
> and assume that implementers will have roll-up groups.
Would it be reasonable to restrict folder based operation based on group type
?
Not a big deal, and I don't have a use case. I was thinking that the
roll-up groups might be identified by type.
TomZ
- [grouper-dev] rules on groups in stem, Chris Hyzer, 09/08/2010
- [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] rules on groups in stem, Tom Zeller, 09/09/2010
- [grouper-dev] RE: [paccman] rules on groups in stem, Chris Hyzer, 09/09/2010
- [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] rules on groups in stem, Tom Zeller, 09/09/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.