COmanage Developers List

[Scott Koranda <>]

> I'm leaning towards suggesting that we always have a pending hotfix
> release. eg: We're working on 1.1.0, but until it's released we have
> 1.0.5 pending. If we decide to release 1.0.5, then we have 1.0.6 pending
> (and so on...). All bugfixes always go into hotfix, then merge into
> develop as usual.
> 
> When 1.1.0 is ready, we simultaneously release the last 1.0.x (say 1.0.6
> in this example), which will be the last of the 1.0 series. We then
> start on 1.2.0, and meanwhile start the same hotfix pattern, but now for
> 1.1.1, 1.1.2, etc.
> 
> Does that make sense? Thoughts?

I think this sounds fine.

Thanks,

Scott