COmanage Developers List

[Arlen Johnson <>]

Makes sense to me (+1), though I am probably least effected on a 
day-to-day basis.

A


On 5/25/16 9:28 AM, Benn Oshrin wrote:
> I'm leaning towards suggesting that we always have a pending hotfix
> release. eg: We're working on 1.1.0, but until it's released we have
> 1.0.5 pending. If we decide to release 1.0.5, then we have 1.0.6 pending
> (and so on...). All bugfixes always go into hotfix, then merge into
> develop as usual.
>
> When 1.1.0 is ready, we simultaneously release the last 1.0.x (say 1.0.6
> in this example), which will be the last of the 1.0 series. We then
> start on 1.2.0, and meanwhile start the same hotfix pattern, but now for
> 1.1.1, 1.1.2, etc.
>
> Does that make sense? Thoughts?
>
> (I'm going to create 1.0.5 in JIRA anyway, as bugfixes are starting to
> pile up and we will likely want one more maintenance release before 1.1.0.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Benn-