comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Question on CO-760 Comment
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Benn Oshrin <>
- To: Scott Koranda <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: [comanage-dev] Question on CO-760 Comment
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:56:56 -0400
Primarily for Scott...
You added a comment to CO-760: "The LIGO use cases would prefer that the NSF demographics link is configurable at the COU level."
The problem with this is that NSF Demographics attach to the CO Person, not a Person Role (which is where the COU is significant), so doing this would be inconsistent.
As an example, imagine COU-1 and COU-2, where COU-1 wants NSF demographics and COU-2 does not.
Person 1 = COU-1 = Enabled
Person 2 = COU-1+COU-2 = Enabled
Person 3 = COU-2 = Disabled
From the perspective of COU-2, Person 2 and Person 3 have different behaviors, which will lead to confusion. That is, if I am viewing the CO Person record for Person 2, do I render the link or not? That view does not vary according to COU (there's no concept of "current COU"), so we'd have to render the link. So even though COU-2 wants it disabled, in some cases it won't be.
Our options here are to make it configurable at the CO level, or refactor NSF demographics to attach to a Role instead of a Person, which doesn't really make sense to me either. (Why would you have a different ethnicity depending on your role?)
Thoughts?
Thanks,
-Benn-
- [comanage-dev] Question on CO-760 Comment, Benn Oshrin, 07/20/2014
- [comanage-dev] Re: Question on CO-760 Comment, Scott Koranda, 07/20/2014
- [comanage-dev] Re: Question on CO-760 Comment, Benn Oshrin, 07/25/2014
- [comanage-dev] Re: Question on CO-760 Comment, Scott Koranda, 07/20/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.