comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:19:54 -0600
Hi,
> On 1/3/12 4:12 PM, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>
> > Do we have the right distribution lists?
>
> (More for Scott) Should there be a LIGO list notified?
No, thanks.
Scott
>
> > Do you think anything else should be in the text?
>
> I think we should have a big disclaimer for now along the lines of
>
> THIS SOFTWARE IS FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY.
> IT IS NOT YET SUITABLE FOR PRODUCTION USE IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT.
>
> Then perhaps a link to the roadmap?
>
> Also, keep in mind we now have two products. We should always be
> referring to COmanage Registry and/or COmanage Directory. At some
> point, we might refer to the COmanage Suite, but we're not there
> yet.
>
> >One thing I am concerned about is that there is no indication on
> > the main page regarding how to get the software. I know it's under
> > Technical Manual, but I think something more should be on the main page.
>
> On the wiki or the website? Perhaps a link to "Download &
> Installation" (which doesn't actually exist) should be placed in the
> bullet list on the wiki?
>
> >I'm also concerned that as soon as we start doing formal announcements
> > (which we should be doing Real Soon Now) we need to have better
> > instructions for how folks actually install this. Comments in the code
> > don't count. :-) Benn, while you're doing the Cake update, is this
> > something Marie can work on?
>
> Moderately skilled sys admins should be able to follow the instructions at
>
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/Registry+Installation
>
> While the page could use some reworking, it shouldn't be necessary
> to read through the code to get installation going. We've been
> pretty picky about keeping those instructions up to date (albeit not
> super readable).
>
> Incidentally, COmanage Directory should be 0.1 Real Soon Now, though
> it's pretty think. Not sure if we want to include it in the first
> announcement.
>
> Also, we can't do an announcement until TSG gets anonsvn sync'ing
> fixed (otherwise people can't see the release).
>
> -Benn-
- [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate, Heather Flanagan, 01/03/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate, Benn Oshrin, 01/03/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate, Scott Koranda, 01/03/2012
- Re: [comanage-dev] announcement boilerplate, Benn Oshrin, 01/03/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.