comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: heather flanagan <>
- To: CoMaNaGe-DeV List <>
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:33:13 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fJpuJeRhkmDVSjXOhULEOOd5Qq2QccBSVVIa7SEufhjelM5mf51cqiKppQsf+/2t69 Ag8dEKD60aS2Ascf6KNF/DjZQzOiUDV7P6JMBIWianaA5DAJRgBgzq//ZPvbaT6gmsId e2tTyopmEgruP+pIWX9bSl7hfzP5cGvu/Ofo4=
Yep, that's what I was looking for. If it was a snake, it woulda bit me.
Now to find a definition for "role". I know we (middleware folks) have one around somewhere.
-heather f.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Steve Olshansky <> wrote:
http://www.internet2.edu/comanage/faq.html#6
On Oct 28, 2010, at 9:24 AM, heather flanagan wrote:
> of a CO versus a VO. It is around somewhere - anyone have the link?
>
> -heather f.
- [comanage-dev] looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010
- [comanage-dev] Re: looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition, Steve Olshansky, 10/28/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.