comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Re: looking for that definition

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

From: heather flanagan <>
To: CoMaNaGe-DeV List <>
Subject: [comanage-dev] Re: looking for that definition
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:41:59 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QzrLsI9HKMuKFgSGo+8EwJipFFsN+k7toM+eFMRTQZu/MoDRC2EwV9/IFVCWJzkGM1 Hvj9S/DqjXqAOmM+hyL0Kgu+sFPD48zIvPE4i3vhbqNPplSi7rQrFfqAgNpHLLKdjypW HsULuJYKFLnqrIycgC2bswRkTqek6Xy14oPtc=

specifically, I was looking for that definition Michael had out there somewhere.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:24 AM, heather flanagan <> wrote:

of a CO versus a VO. It is around somewhere - anyone have the link?

-heather f.

[comanage-dev] looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010
- [comanage-dev] Re: looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition, Steve Olshansky, 10/28/2010
  - Re: [comanage-dev] looking for that definition, heather flanagan, 10/28/2010