Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] info gathering question

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] info gathering question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: heather flanagan <>
  • To: Benn Oshrin <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] info gathering question
  • Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:27:53 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sP5SALj8TQWnPZ8z1G8N+bnrJcuJs8NGaoxbnqYhK1c+vD0mMrx95bC7XXKnE811Kd BowoN3XSUFhWSSbkKnpgUgDhLHIl65AUIiGSZkThCmJIWV0smZyTlEx6Zw/Hrc5qQY69 j5vqQ/rEqKnV0Zq8tdi64d8HVtAdU95X1x2uQ=



On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Benn Oshrin <> wrote:
On 8/24/10 1:43 PM, heather flanagan wrote:
For the large CO we're focusing on, the ones that will be standing up
their own instances, do we have any interest in quantity of data they
expect to be housed in this service?  I'm thinking we may end up with
two slightly different info gathering questions - one for us to learn
about the CO that will stand up their own instance, and one for CO that
we expect to be in our own service.  For the latter, I think we will
need to know about reliability expectations, quantity of data, etc.

I suspect the quantity of the type of data the platform is likely to deal with won't be particularly large.  We're not talking about storing raw data from instruments in the platform, right?  Or are we?


No, I don't think so.  Tho' it might be good to specify that fact somewhere. 

-heather f.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page