comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Benn Oshrin <>
- To:
- Subject: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:08:01 -0400
As an exercise, following a call with Scott Koranda, I took a stab at adding “SSH” to the registry of domesticated applications.
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/Registry+of+Domesticated+Applications
Unsurprisingly, I ran into a couple of problems.
First, what exactly do we mean by “SSH”? The registry is for applications, not protocols. There are a number of applications that support SSH, both clients and servers. Arbitrarily, I selected OpenSSH.
Secondly, OpenSSH is actually pretty domesticated. It integrates with the underlying environment for authentication, authorization, groups, etc. When we say SSH, I think we're actually talking about federated provisioning, which in some ways isn't really an SSH problem.
Thoughts? First on what the actual problem definition is here, and second on how we want to capture it (ie: Registry or not).
Thanks,
-Benn-
- [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Benn Oshrin, 08/19/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Steven Carmody, 08/19/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Benn Oshrin, 08/19/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Jim Leous, 08/20/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Michael A. Grady, 08/20/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Jim Leous, 08/20/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Benn Oshrin, 08/19/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Michael R. Gettes, 08/19/2010
- Re: [comanage-dev] SSH/Domestication, Steven Carmody, 08/19/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.