Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Marketing detour - consistent usage of "COmanage" publicly

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] Marketing detour - consistent usage of "COmanage" publicly


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Heather Flanagan <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Marketing detour - consistent usage of "COmanage" publicly
  • Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:46:07 -0700

Steve, you look good in just about everything!  Tho' that pink tutu they talked you in to one night at the bar, not so sure about that one.  ;-)

COmanage it is.  

-heather f.

On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Steve Olshansky wrote:

I found a shiny junior cadet marketing ring in my cereal this morning, which prompted this. IIRC we agreed a while ago, when we put up the website, that we would use this version of the name consistently.

Would I look good in sharkskin?  8^)
/s

Scotty Logan wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Chris Hyzer wrote:
Im interested in the comanage deployment architecture… I tried to look at documentation and presentations… anyways, are signet and grouper UIs in separate warfiles (classloaders)?
Yes, they are / will be in separate warfiles.
Are there plans to deploy grouper/signet web services to comanage, and if so will those be in separate webapps from the ui (i.e. 4+ webapps)?
CoManage only supports Shibboleth for authentication, so support for web services is complicated.  Having said that, all the infrastructure to support web services and alternative service to service authN is already there within CoManage, but it's outside the current scope (IMHO).
  Scotty

Heather Flanagan
Director, System Administration







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page