wg-pic - Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final]
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Ben Teitelbaum <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final]
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:09:57 -0400
Deke Kassabian
<>
writes:
> I certainly support that idea.
I second the notion of giving the feature requests list wider
circulation. I'm more than happy to put it on either the Web or the
Wiki, but I think it might be more interesting if it were on the Wiki
and updated as an evolving vision of what constitutes leading edge
integrated communications.
-- ben
>
> If it's mainly for us, then wiki. If there's value in having it
> visible to other parties, like developers and vendors who are not
> PIC (yet), then main web site. At least that's my notion. Others?
>
> ^Deke
>
> --On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 7:06 PM -0400 Candace Holman
>
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> Can we discuss posting this list to the main web site, or is this
>> something more suitable for the wiki? I'd like to put it somewhere
>> before it gets lost.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Candace
--
Ben Teitelbaum http://people.internet2.edu/~ben/
- [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final], Candace Holman, 04/12/2006
- Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final], Deke Kassabian, 04/13/2006
- Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final], Candace Holman, 04/13/2006
- Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final], Ben Teitelbaum, 04/20/2006
- Re: [Fwd: [wg-pic] PIC WG Feature Requests - Final], Deke Kassabian, 04/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.