Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Tolly's Skype critique

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

Re: [wg-pic] Tolly's Skype critique


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ben Teitelbaum <>
  • To: ,
  • Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Tolly's Skype critique
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:01:36 -0400

Candace Holman
<>
writes:

> In this article, Tolly studied Skype peer-to-peer traffic to evaluate
> the impact on network bandwidth. He quoted the Skype Web site on what
> peer-to-peer means: "A true [peer-to-peer] system, in our opinion, is
> one where all nodes in a network join together dynamically to
> participate in traffic routing-, processing- and bandwidth-intensive
> tasks that would otherwise be handled by central servers." Interesting
> view. Tolly suggests that this means your Skype-enabled workstation
> may be functioning as a traffic relay for otherwise-centralized call
> processing, conferencing, voice mail, etc.

That seems like a fair definition of "true peer-to-peer" to me. One
of the big reasons that universities may see a lot of Skype traffic is
the use of public IP addresses. Skype needs a share of its users to
be non-NATted to serve as media relays for hosts behind
tricky-to-traverse NATs.

-- ben

--
Ben Teitelbaum http://people.internet2.edu/~ben/


  • Tolly's Skype critique, Candace Holman, 09/29/2005
    • Re: [wg-pic] Tolly's Skype critique, Ben Teitelbaum, 09/29/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page