wg-pic - PA vs. P2P
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Candace Holman <>
- To:
- Subject: PA vs. P2P
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:08 -0400
In anticipation of this week's conference call, Ben and I have been discussing some of the advantages of using a presence agent over using peer to peer communication. I question some of the advantages that I came up, so please comment on this list. Also, please add to this list if you know of additional advantages.
1. Reduced traffic, more scaleable as number of peers rises
2. Reduced access control administration (traffic comes from single source)
3. Synthesized multi-ua information (presence update merging when multiple devices are used by a single presentity)
4. Identity assurance (not strongly authenticated, but some assurance of intradomain identity)
5. Centrally managed contact lists and blacklists (not yet in PIC-SER)
6. Partial presence publishing (not yet in PIC-SER, not sure this has to be centralized either)
Thanks,
Candace
- PA vs. P2P, Candace Holman, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Ben Teitelbaum, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Steve Blair, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Ben Teitelbaum, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Xiaotao Wu, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Candace Holman, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Steve Blair, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Xiaotao Wu, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Ben Teitelbaum, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Steve Blair, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Xiaotao Wu, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Candace Holman, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Xiaotao Wu, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Candace Holman, 05/17/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] PA vs. P2P, Ben Teitelbaum, 05/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.