Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - PA vs. P2P

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

PA vs. P2P


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Candace Holman <>
  • To:
  • Subject: PA vs. P2P
  • Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:55:08 -0400

In anticipation of this week's conference call, Ben and I have been discussing some of the advantages of using a presence agent over using peer to peer communication. I question some of the advantages that I came up, so please comment on this list. Also, please add to this list if you know of additional advantages.

1. Reduced traffic, more scaleable as number of peers rises

2. Reduced access control administration (traffic comes from single source)

3. Synthesized multi-ua information (presence update merging when multiple devices are used by a single presentity)

4. Identity assurance (not strongly authenticated, but some assurance of intradomain identity)

5. Centrally managed contact lists and blacklists (not yet in PIC-SER)

6. Partial presence publishing (not yet in PIC-SER, not sure this has to be centralized either)

Thanks,
Candace





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page