Presence and IntComm WG

[Jeremy George <>]

Steve,

  The people associated with WG meeting topics agreed only to
lead that part of the discussion at that one meeting.  Don't know
what we'll decide to move forward with.  Someone (either a scribe
or me) will send out notes from the meeting.

  Do you like the model we've been using of subgroups?  Shall we
continue with it?

- Jeremy



On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Steve Blair wrote:

> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:50:17 -0400
> From: Steve Blair 
> <>
> Reply-To: 
>
> To: 
>
> Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Austin meeting agenda
>
>
> Jeremy:
>
> I'll help with "Demo future directions" and perhaps
> "Self-deployment packaging" however I need to know
> what "Self-deployment packaging" entails before I am
> wiling to commit. Have fun.
>
> -Steve
>
> Jeremy George wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> >   The WG meeting is scheduled for Wednesday evening 7:30 - 9:00pm in
> > Salon J.
> >
> >   We agreed to six items on the WG meeting agenda.  Four topics have
> > leaders and two have not.  In no particular order they are:
> >
> > 1)  Running a FWD-like service.            Ben
> >
> > 2)  Funding for long term trials.        Jeremy
> >
> >     (Ben has some thoughts for trials that may not require
> >      substantial funding.)
> >
> > 3)  Demo future directions.            Joe
> >
> > 4)  High level paper.                Jeremy
> >
> > 5)  Low level paper.                No leader
> >
> > 6)  Self-deployment packaging.            No leader
> >
> >     (I've had interest expressed in a self-deployed package.  So, I
> >      want to push on this.)
> >
> >   From conversations with sundry folks I also believe some people would
> > like to express general opinions on where we should be heading.  I'll add
> > the somewhat nebulous seventh topic then of overall or general direction.
> >
> >   As in past WG meetings, we may need to give up the meeting room at the
> > scheduled closing hour but we are certainly free to continue in the bar.
> >
> > - Jeremy