Presence and IntComm WG

[Xiaotao Wu <>]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Rork, Joseph (J.P.) wrote:

> room bugging - no
> edial        - no
> voice mail   - no
> handsets     - no
> Session      - yes, so the Mac users can IM with us, not to promote
> voice
> codecs       - since we are not using edial, default to GSM
> email promo  - yes, Jeremy is working on it
>
>
> Is it safe to consider the UA's frozen?  It was my understanding that
> the SIPc install was going to be modified to add in the maps.  When

I am going to send the new installation package by tomorrow.
I will change the default codec to GSM since edial will not be used.

-xiaotao

> was/is this done?  I would like to verify/modify the installation
> documentation on the website by today or tomorrow, so that everything is
> solid when the email goes out.
>
> What is the timing on the calendaring?  Are we going to be ready to let
> other people start to play by Thursday AM?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy George 
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:37 AM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: RE: [wg-pic] Session for MM
>
>
>
> > That then begs the question; do we want edial support?
>
>   I suggest we drop room bugging from this demo and do away with edial.
>
> > We need to get a stake in the ground regarding voice.  From what I am
>
>   The demo is focusing on IM, rich presence and automated location
> services.
>
> > very much including voice.  The key is going to be in the wording of
> > our promotions.  Speaking of which, there was no final decision about
> > the email to all participants as well.
>
>   There was.  HP's proposal was that the demo be pushed to all
> attendees. For me anyway, that implies an emailing.  We're working on
> the language.
>
> > I think that we should still order the handsets since we are still
> > including voice, and I would like a consensus about the email
> > promotion.
>
>   It's up to the group but I think we have enough promotion with the
> iPAQs and I don't think a give away emphasizing voice is the best idea.
> My vote is to hold off on the handsets.
>
> - Jeremy
>
> --
>