Presence and IntComm WG

[Jon Zeeff <>]

>5.6 Gb/s end-to-end between CERN/Geneve and Caltech/LosAngeles.
>When this is done with Reno-based techniques, they very intentionally 
build up (and after packet >loss events, tear down) massive buffers at the 
bottleneck router. This cannot be good for VoIP >etc.

I agree and we need to be careful about buffer sizes on routers.  They 
generally need to be
smaller than most people think.

In the CERN/Caltech case, was there a bottleneck router?  My understanding 
was that they
had 10gbit all the way (such that the bottleneck was the end systems).

----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

   http://archives.internet2.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic--