Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: SAP storm detector

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: SAP storm detector


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Leonard Giuliano <>
  • To: Zenon Mousmoulas <>
  • Cc: wg-multicast <>, Phil Shafer <>
  • Subject: Re: SAP storm detector
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:55:45 -0700 (PDT)


On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:

-) This is great, but I'd like to see how it can be extended so that a
specific
-) appropriate action can be taken automatically, for example policing
offending
-) sources.
-) I suppose you would need a stateful service that would track offending
-) sources as they appear and disappear and then somehow signal the router to
-) take the action, i.e. match the sources with criteria in a policy-statement
-) that would be used to apply a particular traffic policer.

What you are looking for is the ability to commit configuration changes as
an action of an event script (if rate exceeds, then police/filter instead
of just syslog). That functionality is coming soon, but for now best you
can do is some type of alert like syslog.

-) There are probably many different ways to do such signaling; one could be
-) using specially-crafted bgp announcements tagged with a specific community
-) that would then be used in source-class filter match conditions. Such a
-) method would resemble qos-group tags used in Cisco QPPB[1].

You could probably do the QPPB thing today, but you still need a mechanism
to set the BGP attribute as a result of exceeding the configured rate for
the group.

-) I suppose such a service would have to live outside the router. If you were
-) to implement something like that, would it also be possible to discover
-) offending sources by some other means, e.g. snmp queries, rather than
through
-) this script and syslog?

You should be able to find offending sources today through SNMP- I believe
the mcast MIB shows pkt rates.

-)
-) Getting this to work automatically is obviously somewhat complicated. Some
-) folks may prefer to do it manually or even go with a more naive approach of
-) policing all sap traffic. I noticed that you advise against such an
approach
-) and I certainly agree with your justification. However I was wondering if
you
-) would care to comment on the hack that I happened to mention a couple of
-) weeks ago[2], involving the use of multicast flow maps. Would this be
-) feasible at all? Would it be too expensive, in terms of router resources?
-)

Flow-maps were designed for a different app, so it's probably not the
droid you're looking for. I don't think it can be used to do any more
than what a simple filter/policer would do.



  • Re: SAP storm detector, Leonard Giuliano, 07/01/2008

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page