wg-multicast - Re: Another multicast test
Please Wait...
wg-multicast@internet2.edu
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- To: Richard Mavrogeanes <rmavro@vbrick.com>
- Cc: wg-multicast <wg-multicast@internet2.edu>, David C Tarrant <dct05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Nicholas J Humfrey <njh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: Another multicast test
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:44:08 +0100
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:14:24AM -0400, Richard Mavrogeanes wrote:
> MPEG-4 is and should be lower quality than MPEG-2....it is much lower
> bandwidth, 320 x 240, and is pt 2, SP. Per the standard, the audio with
> the MPEG-4 is AAC. Both are coming in loud and clear here.
Apologies for the brain fart :) I was confused because I thought the
MPEG4 version had no sound but that was the higher quality image.
Regardless, both look very good with little evidence visually of loss.
Tim
- RE: Another multicast test, Richard Mavrogeanes, 08/18/2006
- Re: Another multicast test, Tim Chown, 08/18/2006
- Re: Another multicast test, Frank Fulchiero, 08/19/2006
- Re: Another multicast test, Tim Chown, 08/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.