Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: Is Multicast a Real Service?

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Is Multicast a Real Service?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: bdr <>
  • To: Russ Hobby <>
  • Cc: , Laurence Kirchmeier <>
  • Subject: Re: Is Multicast a Real Service?
  • Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:57:48 -0500

FWIW - I talked with Lauire about some of these issues this week. We thought we might try a couple of things, using iperf. We thought we might do a traceroute from each of the endpoints to the other. Then we thought we might try some multicast using iperf between UMich and the Merit GigaPop, then between UMich and the first Abilene node, then between UMich and the next Abilene node, working our way out to Stanford - measuring setup time, RTT, and reliability.
Seemed like trying to identify the network node(s) where the problems are occuring might be a good place to start.
Laurie - what did I forget?



Russ Hobby wrote:

Any thoughts on how we can resolve this problem and more importantly detect where it is happening before the researcher has to complain about it? It is still going on without resolution for Steve on his link to UMich . It is just a matter of time when they try the next location and find the problem.

Russ

At 08:57 PM 10/26/2005, Steven Senger wrote:

Well it has been a while since I got out of class but other things
interrupted.

One caveat. I'm not a network engineer and I almost certainly don't
use the correct terminology but here goes.

Lea has described the problem we were seeing in CENIC and Stanford.
From my point of view the symptoms were a little more exciting then
the short description implies. When we first started this we would
see setup delays in excess of 10 minutes before traffic would start
flowing. Going from Abilene to CENIC in LA changed from Juniper to
Cisco and when we finally got an answer from Cisco it had to do with
a difference in implementation on how the routers handled the
encapsulated and non-encapsulated cases. The result was that traffic
sourced in Wisconsin would not show delays going to Stanford but
traffic sourced from Michigan would. The solution was that Cisco was
changing their behavior to agree with Juniper. When tech support
finally told us this, after several months of on and off testing, it
was rather anticlimactic but did fix the problem in CENIC.

Once that problem was solved we found that there is still a small
amount of setup delay (0 - 45 sec, measured every hour) between the
source in michigan and Merit. It presumably has a similar cause but
has not yet been solved.

We are also seeing a weird situation in WiscNet. We first stumbled
upon this using Access Grid between Wisconsin and Stanford. Things
would work correctly for weeks at a time and then one day the video
traffic from Wisconsin would not get to Stanford but the audio
traffic would or vice versa. I eventually figured out that I could
source traffic from Wisconsin on a group and have it arrive at
Stanford without problems. But starting a receiver for the group on
my campus would block the traffic from getting through WiscNet. So
far we have determined that there is a Juniper box in WiscNet that is
misbehaving. Restarting the rpd process on the box corrects the
situation and it will stay working for a month or more but will
eventually fail. When it is failing, in addition to the basic
behavior of local receivers blocking outbound traffic, there seem to
be a number of other odd behaviors that I have not fully cataloged.

I don't think we are trying to do the impossible but any help would
be greatly appreciated.

- steve

On Oct 25, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Lea Roberts wrote:

--
Bob Riddle
()
Technologist,Internet2
3025 Boardwalk, Suite 100 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108
Business Phone: 734.913.4257 Fax Number: 734.913.4255

"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that amateurs built the Ark.
Professionals built the Titanic." Dave Barry




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page