wg-multicast - Re: some IGMP snooping switch evaluations
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Dan Pritts <>
- To: Alan Crosswell <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: some IGMP snooping switch evaluations
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:55:32 -0500
> 3. Why do both the HP and Cisco flood the group-specific query out all
> ports? Shouldn't this only go to the ports currently joined to the group?
> Does this matter?
I don't think it's a negative. The traffic level is trivial and it reduces
the complexity.
> 4. Why does the Cisco pass along all v3 host membership reports instead
> of just the one needed to keep the router happy? Does this matter?
see previous answer.
danno
--
dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2
734/352-4953 office 734/834-7224 mobile
- some IGMP snooping switch evaluations, Alan Crosswell, 12/16/2004
- Re: some IGMP snooping switch evaluations, Dan Pritts, 12/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.