Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: Meeting Notes and WG Status

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Meeting Notes and WG Status


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bill Owens <>
  • To: "Kevin C. Almeroth" <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: Meeting Notes and WG Status
  • Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 14:57:32 -0400

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:16:32PM -0700, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
> + Support for IPv6. Currently the plan is to offer IPv6 SSM.
> Also under discussion in the Abilene NOC is whether to
> provide an Embedded RP.

I think perhaps that the second sentence is mixing two things; the question
of whether to operate an RP for some group address range within the Abilene
backbone, and the question of whether the Abilene core routers will support
embedded-RP.

The first probably implies that the Abilene routers will also be configured
with knowledge of the existing global RP at RENATER and the other well-known
RPs being used on the m2bone, and therefore be able to support ASM with
existing tools. Some people fell that this would be a technical misstep,
either because they don't like the idea of a shared RP, or because they don't
like ASM.

The second requires that JUNOS support embedded-RP, which it does not at
present. It also implies support for ASM.

And finally it is worth noting that AFAIK there are few tools or OSes that
support IPv6 SSM. That's something that ought to be fixed over time, but for
the moment supporting only SSM is roughly equivalent to not supporting IPv6
multicast at all. . .

Bill.



  • Re: Meeting Notes and WG Status, Bill Owens, 05/03/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page