Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: RP mapping survey (fwd)

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: RP mapping survey (fwd)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Toerless Eckert <>
  • To:
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: RP mapping survey (fwd)
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:41:07 -0800

Hmm, so nobody is using or allowed to report that they are
using static RP with MSDP-Anycast-RP ? ;-))

Cheers
Toerless

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:11:37PM -0800,

wrote:
>
> Okay, 14 responded fairly quickly... where's everyone else? Every response
> improves the value of the survey.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to better understand current RP mapping practices and preferences
> > of this community. If you have deployed PIM-SM anywhere on your campus or
> > gigapop or are in the process of deploying, could you answer a few
> > questions for me? I'll compile the results and post them back to the list.
> >
> > ------
> >
> > What is your current RP mapping mechanism?
> > a. BSR
> > b. Auto-RP
> > c. Static RP
> >
> > How many routers in your PIM domain?
> > ( a rough number is fine - I just think it may be interesting to see if
> > there is a connection between the chosen RP mechanism and size of domain)
> >
> > How many RPs in your PIM domain?
> >
> > Can you briefly explain why you chose the RP mapping mechanism you use?
> > (ie. reliability, vendor recommendation, plug-n-play, don't know, etc.)
> >
> > ------
> >
> > Please send replies directly to me for compilation as I'm not sure if this
> > email address is on the list (as my previous address is now defunct). And
> > if you think this data should be collected in some other way - say by the
> > working group chair or his assignee - then please speak-up and volunteer
> > Kevin for the job. ;-) Otherwise, fire away!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Greg




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page