wg-multicast - Items for the Agenda in SB
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "David Farmer" <>
- To:
- Subject: Items for the Agenda in SB
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:20:57 -0600
- Organization: NTS, U of MN
- Priority: normal
I'd like to bring up two Items, that kind of overlap with the Routing
WG.
1. Can we use IRRd to hold Multicast source routing information
and policy? Should we put Multicast info in an Internet2 Registry?
2. Multicast Peering Policy for Internet2, it is my understanding
that there in none? Give the discussion in Florida about AS10888
and a default multicast route, I think it might be time to start
thinking about a simple Multicast peering policy.
I would propose:
A. Advertising of AS10888 sources and the default be limited
Abilene participants, primary or secondary.
B. A new Abilene Community be created to mark Multicast routes
learned from potentially commercial sources. The routes learned
form AS10888 and the default Multicast route be marked with this
community. GigaPOPs and/or Abilene should mark Multicast
routes learned from non-Internet2 sources with this community.
C. A new Abilene Community be created to mark Multicast routes
learned form Internet2 peer networks that do not want to be
advertised to non-Internet2 participants.
D. GigaPOPs only advertise Multicast routes marked with the
communities in B and C to Abilene primary and secondary
participants. And, not advertise them to other peers.
I think this would prevent potentially commercial sources from
being received by commercial receivers. But would allow Internet2
and some peer sources to be view by commercial receivers.
I think there are probably MSDP issues I am over looking here
since MSDP doesn't have communities like MBGP, but I don't
think they are a major problem.
I bring this up be cause I think GigaPOPs could help promote
Multicast outside strict Internet2 borders, by providing Internet2
multicast content to non-Internet2 entities and even regional
commercial ISPs. While at the same time provide Internet2
participants with access to as much Multicast content as possible.
But I think there needs to be some basic controls. I think this
proposal lives up to the goals of Internet2.
Sorry, I didn't get this out sooner, but most of this didn't gel until
last night.
PS. I planing on participating via phone, someone get paul love or
Kevin to call me from SB.
==================================================================
David Farmer Email:
Networking and Telecommunications Services
University of Minnesota
2221 University Ave. SE, Suite 145 Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3074 FAX: 612-626-1002
==================================================================
- Items for the Agenda in SB, David Farmer, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Farmer, 02/26/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/26/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Farmer, 02/26/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Hugh LaMaster, 02/25/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Bill Fenner, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Hugh LaMaster, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Gordon Rogier, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Hugh LaMaster, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/25/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, Kevin C. Almeroth, 02/26/2000
- Re: Items for the Agenda in SB, David Meyer, 02/25/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.