sip.edu - Re: [sip.edu] [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook]
Subject: SIP in higher education
List archive
- From: Jeremy George <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [sip.edu] [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook]
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:54:56 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Alan,
Without going back over the config it looks like a minor stylistic
change. Loose_route() just sets up the condition. t_relay() executes.
You'd need to read further down in the script to see how it executes.
I don't think it's a big deal. My guess is that iptel.org has updated
and likely compacted the config since I did the one online some months
ago.
- Jeremy
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Alan Crosswell wrote:
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:16:13 -0400
> From: Alan Crosswell
> <>
> Reply-To:
>
> To:
>
> Subject: [sip.edu] [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook]
>
> This time you should see my intended CC:
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: loose_route question in cookbook
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:31:50 -0400
> From: Alan Crosswell
> <>
> To: Jeremy George
> <>
> CC:
>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> In the cookbook it says:
>
> # separate the destination r-uri from the set of proxies that must be
> traversed
> loose_route();
>
> while in my ser.cfg that comes from I guess a iptel.org example it says:
> # loose-route processing
> if (loose_route()) {
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
>
> Can you explain what this is all about?
> /a
>
--
- [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook], Alan Crosswell, 06/25/2004
- Re: [sip.edu] [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook], Rob McCartney, 06/25/2004
- Re: [sip.edu] [Fwd: loose_route question in cookbook], Jeremy George, 06/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.